Do you need to consider any monitoring before, during or after your therapy?
July 19, 2019How have lower courts interpreted the Branzburg v. Hayes decision based on whether the cases involved civil, criminal, or grand jury proceedings
July 19, 2019
- Scroll through the entire document, does the author use 1 margins on the top, bottom, right, and left? If no, explain.yes they have all this in there paper.
- Scroll though the entire document. Does the author double space the entire document uniformly? (There should be no extra spaces between paragraphs.) If no, explain.Its doubled spaced but there is spaces in between paragraphs.
- Is the entire document formatted using Times New Roman (TNR) 12 pt. font? If no, explain.yes they have all this in there paper.
- Does the author include an APA cover page? If so, does it include a header that says, Running head: TITLE OF PAPER IN ALL CAPS. The running head should be on the left margin. On the right hand side of the header, should be the page number. If the author’s header is not correct, tell them how to fix it.he has these but running head needs to be title and title capitalized.
- Does the author include an APA cover page? If so, does it include the title of the paper, centered, in title case with no bold, no emboldened, no enlarged font). The title should appear in the middle of the page. If no, explain.yes they have all this in there paper.
- Does the title make clear the position of the paper? If no, explain.yes they have all this in there paper.
- Does the author include an APA cover page? If so, does it include the author’s name and the school name centered, spelled, and capitalized correctly? If no, explain.he has all these but title needs to be capitalized.
- Look at all of the other pages of the document (other than the cover page). Does each page include a header with the title of the paper in all caps and a correct page number? (NOTE: only the cover page should include the words Running head.) If no, explain to the author what he or she should do to correct this issue.No title on the first page, but does have running head.
- Look at the first page of the paper (the page after the cover page), does the author include the title of the paper, centered, in title case at the top? Remember the title should not have italics, quotation marks, all-caps, enlarged font, emboldened font, or underderline) If the title is not correct, explain.No there is no title only a subheading, wasnt supposed to use subheadings.
- Look at the entire paper – does the length seem to be in range? (3 pages of text + References) If no, explain to the author what he or she should do to correct this issue.yes they have all this in there paper.
- Scroll through the paper – are the paragraphs properly indented? If no, explain what you think should be changed.yes they have all this in there paper.
- Look at the References – This should be a separate, last page of the document. Does the author include a minimum of 4 sources? If no, explain what you think should be changed.There is only three sources when there needs to be four.
- Look at the References – are the sources listed in alphabetical order? If no, explain what you think should be changed.Yes the sources he has are i aplhabetical order.
- Look at the References – is it properly indented? (hanging indent) If no, explain what you think should be changed.On the first reference there is but for the other two theres only one time.
- Look at the References – does the source information seem to be properly presented and punctuated according to APA? If no, explain what you think should be changed.The first reference looks correct, but the other two im not sure about.
- Look at each source on the References – are they reliable? are they scholarly? Comment on the quality of sources.The first one looks good, and the last one is a book but im not sure about the second one.
- Read the introduction – is each sentence easy to read? Is it engaging? Is the punctuation/capitalization correct? If yes, explain what you like about the introduction. If no, explain what you think should be changed.The introduction was good had a good history of the problem.
- Read the thesis statement (last sentence of the introduction). Does this sentence express both the problem and a solution? Is the sentence punctuated correctly? Please restate the problem and the solution. Provide additional comments on the thesis.yes the thesis statement does show the problem, but it needs to be at the end of the introduction.
- After reading the introduction, scroll through the paper looking at the first sentence of each paragraph – does each topic sentence connect clearly to the thesis? What are the key words that help you follow the organization of the paper? If the topic sentences are not clearly related to the thesis, explain to the author what he or she should do to correct this issue.Yes it does sound like a good topic sentence, and the flow of words is good.
- After reading the topic sentences of each body paragraph, rate the quality of the introduction. Is the introduction an accurate entry into the content and organization of the paper? If yes, 5. If no, 1.3 of 5
- Read the first body paragraph – does the paragraph include appropriate paragraph organization? (topic sentence/assertion/evidence/commentary/wrap-up) If no, explain what you think should be changed.Its correctly formatted but there is no evidence and sources being used.
- Skim the body paragraphs – Do the body paragraphs include quoted, paraphrased, or summarized information that has been correctly cited using in-text references and/or parenthesis? If no, explain what you think should be changed.There are intext citations but there are only use of two when there needs to be 3.
- Read the next body paragraph – does the author seem to balance cited information with his or her own words in the first 2 body paragraphs? Comment on the quality of the paragraphs. What do you like? What should the author improve?Its more of his words there is only one use of cited work.
- Read the remaining body paragraphs – comment on the quality of the paragraphs. Is it easy to follow the writer’s ideas? Is it logical? Are the sentences correctly punctuated? What has the writer done well?The flow of the paper is good, but the majority is his words so im not sure if its logical or not.
- How many BODY paragraphs does this paper include? (Do not count the intro or conclusion) What is the focus of each paragraph? If you are unable to identify the focus of each paragraph, what should the writer do to help you understand?There are four paragraphs that are in the body paragraphs.
- After reading the body paragraphs, does the author use at least one counterargument? (Does the author acknowledge a different solution or position and explain why it is unacceptable?) If yes, write the counterargument here. If no, explain to the author what he or she should do to correct this issue.Im not really sure what the counterarugment was it was just talking about the problem and solution.
- Overall, how effective are the body paragraphs for supporting the thesis/position?3 of 5
- Read the conclusion – does the conclusion echo the thesis and persuade the reader? If no, explain what you think should be changed.yes they have all this in there paper.
- Typically, a conclusion should not include citations. Is the conclusion in the writer’s own words? If no, explain what you think should be changed.Conclusion was persuading and didnt have citations.
- Overall, how effective is the conclusion for making the reader feel persuaded to do or believe something?3 of 5
- After reading the paper – rate the writer’s use of sentence structure (consider fragments or run-on sentences as well as the use of S, CX, CD, or CD-CX sentences)4 of 5
- Justify your rating of the author’s sentence structure using an specific sentence example from the paper.The sentence structure was good, and he used alot of good educational words.
- After reading the paper – rate the writer’s use of vocabulary.4 of 5
- Justify your rating of the author’s use of vocabulary using specific examples from the paper.The vocabulary was very god and used scholarly words in the paper.
- Review the paper – did the author use personal pronouns (I, me, my, you)? If yes, in what part of the paper were the personal pronouns used. Did the use of pronouns enhance or detract from the persuasive tone of the paper? Explain.No there were no personal pronouns used.
- After reading the paper – rate the author’s academic tone (consider word choice, use of contractions, use of personal pronouns, etc.)4 of 5
- Justify your rating of the author’s academic tone by using specific examples from the paper.The paper was good and had information about the problem and solution, but alot was in his own words and didnt have alot of evidence from online.
- What constructive criticism do you offer this writer? Include at least 3 elements of the paper in which the writer excelled and/or needs improvement.The paper was good and had alot of engaging information, but there were minor mistakes with formatting and the use of sources in the paper. Also the reference page needs more sources and needs to see if they are correctly
